We Need a Better Plan for Our Economy, Like Japan Has | Economy In Crisis
Home Who We Are Our Staff and Contributors Our Mission Primary Concerns We Believe market appraisal Contact Us Issues Free Trade Fast Track Trade Authority TPP TAFTA/TTIP TISA WTO KORUS NAFTA Toxic Food Tax Reform Economic market appraisal Solutions Video Inspiring Music Economic Statistics Economic Solutions H.R. 3467 H.R. 156 H.R. 3012 and S. 2821 H. R. 1276 Submission Guidelines
Archives Select Month August market appraisal 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February market appraisal 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August market appraisal 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September market appraisal 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 February 2008 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 March 2007
Capitalism is motivated by profit, which can be affected by government tax or other policies and foreign competition. If the policy of the government and foreign market appraisal competition does not allow for profitable returns on investment in critical market appraisal domestic industries then it seems there are two options:
1) Protectionism By closing the trading borders, domestic demand may be met with increased industrial domestic investment. However, in limiting foreign goods, market appraisal U.S. consumers will not be able to afford much-needed goods until domestic industry catches up. There is also the risk of encouraging domestic monopolies and suffering a loss of efficiency.
2) Government direct investment For industries that do not provide sufficient return for risking private capital, there should be a way to employ public money to benefit the entire country. This is what happens with government health care programs, military, public transportation, and countless other examples. There should be some mechanism to ensure that core commodity industries (like steel and transportation) that form the basic platform for a self-sufficient industrial country be maintained even if these commodity industries themselves are not profitable to private investors.
According market appraisal to the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), MITI facilitated the early development of nearly all major industries by providing protection from import competition, technological intelligence, help in licensing foreign technology, access to foreign exchange, and assistance in mergers.
MITI served as an architect of industrial policy, an arbiter on industrial problems and disputes, and a regulator. A major objective of the ministry was to strengthen the country s industrial base [by encouraging investment market appraisal through incentives and selection of most needed products and development procedures to be developed that would benefit their most important industries like steel and robotics]. It did not manage Japanese trade and industry along the lines of a centrally planned market appraisal economy, but it did provide industries with administrative guidance and other direction, both formal and informal, on modernization, technology, investments in new plants and equipment, and domestic and foreign competition.
Japan has used intelligent planning as opposed to our unplanned industrial regression (witness the auto industry). Japan is accomplishing this from the base of ashes it had at the end of the war in 1945, with only 4% of our land area, 40% of our population and absolutely no natural resources. It is very obvious market appraisal from their example that there are better ways than our own and that major changes should take place immediately or we will be relegated to a second class power and eventually a second class country.
We should take the best that other countries have to offer and refine it with our own experience and objectives. By doing nothing we allow those countries that have developed to continue dismantling our own system and destroying our ability to compete.
"free trade" market appraisal Barack Obama China Currency Manipulation economy Free Trade Imports Jobs korus Manufacturing NAFTA National Debt Opinion Editorials Outsourcing Politics TPP Trade Deficit Trans-Pacific Partnership Unemployment WTO Has America Already Lost the Trade War?
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: diet | Thanks to lasik , online colleges and seo
Home Who We Are Our Staff and Contributors Our Mission Primary Concerns We Believe market appraisal Contact Us Issues Free Trade Fast Track Trade Authority TPP TAFTA/TTIP TISA WTO KORUS NAFTA Toxic Food Tax Reform Economic market appraisal Solutions Video Inspiring Music Economic Statistics Economic Solutions H.R. 3467 H.R. 156 H.R. 3012 and S. 2821 H. R. 1276 Submission Guidelines
Archives Select Month August market appraisal 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February market appraisal 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August market appraisal 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September market appraisal 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 February 2008 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 March 2007
Capitalism is motivated by profit, which can be affected by government tax or other policies and foreign competition. If the policy of the government and foreign market appraisal competition does not allow for profitable returns on investment in critical market appraisal domestic industries then it seems there are two options:
1) Protectionism By closing the trading borders, domestic demand may be met with increased industrial domestic investment. However, in limiting foreign goods, market appraisal U.S. consumers will not be able to afford much-needed goods until domestic industry catches up. There is also the risk of encouraging domestic monopolies and suffering a loss of efficiency.
2) Government direct investment For industries that do not provide sufficient return for risking private capital, there should be a way to employ public money to benefit the entire country. This is what happens with government health care programs, military, public transportation, and countless other examples. There should be some mechanism to ensure that core commodity industries (like steel and transportation) that form the basic platform for a self-sufficient industrial country be maintained even if these commodity industries themselves are not profitable to private investors.
According market appraisal to the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), MITI facilitated the early development of nearly all major industries by providing protection from import competition, technological intelligence, help in licensing foreign technology, access to foreign exchange, and assistance in mergers.
MITI served as an architect of industrial policy, an arbiter on industrial problems and disputes, and a regulator. A major objective of the ministry was to strengthen the country s industrial base [by encouraging investment market appraisal through incentives and selection of most needed products and development procedures to be developed that would benefit their most important industries like steel and robotics]. It did not manage Japanese trade and industry along the lines of a centrally planned market appraisal economy, but it did provide industries with administrative guidance and other direction, both formal and informal, on modernization, technology, investments in new plants and equipment, and domestic and foreign competition.
Japan has used intelligent planning as opposed to our unplanned industrial regression (witness the auto industry). Japan is accomplishing this from the base of ashes it had at the end of the war in 1945, with only 4% of our land area, 40% of our population and absolutely no natural resources. It is very obvious market appraisal from their example that there are better ways than our own and that major changes should take place immediately or we will be relegated to a second class power and eventually a second class country.
We should take the best that other countries have to offer and refine it with our own experience and objectives. By doing nothing we allow those countries that have developed to continue dismantling our own system and destroying our ability to compete.
"free trade" market appraisal Barack Obama China Currency Manipulation economy Free Trade Imports Jobs korus Manufacturing NAFTA National Debt Opinion Editorials Outsourcing Politics TPP Trade Deficit Trans-Pacific Partnership Unemployment WTO Has America Already Lost the Trade War?
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: diet | Thanks to lasik , online colleges and seo
No comments:
Post a Comment